Guidance for future packaging decisions in the food industry.
The requirements for cheese packaging are changing noticeably – driven by new regulatory frameworks such as the PPWR, increasing expectations for recyclability, and the pressure to rethink existing material structures.
At the same time, product-specific requirements remain high: cheese is sensitive to oxygen, moisture, and mechanical stress. Packaging must therefore continue to ensure reliable product protection and consistent shelf life.
We support you in evaluating this complexity in a structured way:
Together, we analyze your current packaging, consider product-specific requirements such as barrier properties and shelf life, and assess which solutions are practical and feasible under real production conditions.
.jpg)
How can these requirements be met without jeopardizing existing processes?
This challenge shows: It’s not just about a new material – but about the interplay of multiple factors:
Recyclable packaging is gaining importance in Flowpack applications in the cheese industry. Regulatory developments such as the European Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) are further increasing the pressure on packaging solutions. At the same time, product protection and stable processes remain essential. For dairy producers, this means new solutions must not only be sustainable, but above all reliable in operation.
Flowpack packaging is one of the key packaging formats in the cheese industry - for applications such as grated cheese, sliced products or portioned items. At the same time, requirements for recyclability and material efficiency are increasing. For dairy producers, this means that existing packaging solutions must be further developed and assessed at an early stage in terms of their long-term viability under future regulatory conditions.
In practice, it quickly becomes clear that switching to new materials is not purely a material-driven issue. The main challenge is to maintain stable production processes and keep risks under control. Packaging solutions must integrate into existing lines and perform reliably under real production conditions, without introducing additional instability into the process. Not every solution that is theoretically recyclable can be implemented reliably in production.
Between requirements and production reality
Flowpack processes are designed for high efficiency. Lines operate at high speeds and within narrow process windows, making them highly sensitive to changes in material behaviour.Even minor deviations can have noticeable effects - for example on seal quality or material handling. Variations in temperature or product characteristics can further affect process stability and increase the demands placed on packaging materials.
Nicole Schehle, Head of R&D at EK-Pack, emphasises:
“Oxygen ingress, microleakages or unstable sealing immediately lead to quality and shelf lifeissues.”
In practice, this means that packaging solutions must not only perform under laboratory conditions, but also under real production environments—at speed, under fluctuating influences and in continuous operation. What matters is that this stability can be ensured consistently over time.
Monomaterial as a solution approach
Monomaterial solutions are considered a key approach to enabling recyclability and simplifying material structures. In particular, PE- and PP-based films are at the centre of current developments.
However, in real applications, replacing existing multi-material structures requires targeted adjustments. Requirements for barrier performance, sealing behaviour and mechanical properties remain unchanged and must continue to be met to ensure product protection and shelf life.
At the same time, existing PE- and PP-based structures are continuously being refined to meet these requirements reliably while addressing increasing recyclability requirements.
“Monomaterial solutions will only succeed if they are functionally equivalent,” says Nicole Schehle. “Simply changing the material is not enough.” – Nicole Schehle
For dairy producers, this means monomaterial is a key approach—but only if the solution fits the specific application, product and existing processing conditions and proves itself in practice.
Introducing new materials: controlled rather than risky
Introducing new packaging materials always involves a careful trade-off. Production managers must ensure that existing lines continue to run stably and that planned performance levels are maintained.
New materials are therefore primarily evaluated based on whether they can be integrated without major adjustments and enable stable processes. In many cases, implementation takes place step by step—first tested under real production conditions before being rolled out more broadly into regular operation.
Nicole Schehle makes this clear: “Sustainability must not lead to longer cycle times or waste. New materials must prove themselves within existing processes.”
This leads to a clear requirement: packaging solutions must be designed to run reliably under real conditions while also meeting recyclability requirements. What matters is not theoretical suitability, but actual process performance.
Interaction between material and application
The development of recyclable packaging solutions is increasingly driven by specific applications. Material properties, machine technology and process parameters must be considered together.
In practice, there is no universal solution. The suitability of materials depends strongly on the specific product, application and process conditions. These differences require a differentiated evaluation and close alignment between development and production.
Success is determined in practice.
Discussions about packaging are often strongly focused on materials. In practice, however, what matters is whether a solution works reliably in day-to-day operation and can be used consistently over time.
For dairy producers, this leads to a clear priority: packaging solutions must not only berecyclable, but must also perform reliably under real operating conditions.
Product protection, process stability and recyclability must be achieved together.
Ultimately, the suitability of a solution can only be assessed through the interaction of material, process and application. What matters is not theoretical performance, but proven reliability under real conditions.
Monomaterial solutions offer a clear perspective:
Simplified material structures provide greater transparency and improved control across the entire value chain
Uniform material systems enable more efficient sorting and improve actual recyclability within the circular economy
Suitable solutions can be designed to integrate into existing packaging lines and operate reliably
What matters is implementation in practice:
Materials must be consistently processable on existing equipment and remain reliable even at high speeds
New material solutions must reliably ensure protection of aroma, moisture, and shelf life under real conditions
The transition must not negatively impact product quality or the desired shelf life and must function reliably in the long term